Heating equipment, warm air (i.e., forced air), manufacturing · Texas

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace

Houston, TX · ~1,074 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heating equipment, warm air (i.e., forced air), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Heating equipment, warm air (i.e., forced air), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace safety composite

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2017

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace injury rate improved

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.8 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #40/52
  • PHOTO Seasons-4, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~1,074 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seasons-4, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Heating equipment, warm air (i.e., forced air), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace falls in its industry

461 Heating equipment, warm air (i establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 52 Heating equipment, warm air (i employers in Texas.

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace (1,074 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace
Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace (1,074 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Goodman Manufacturing Company - Furnace has more employees than the Heating equipment, warm air (i.e., force median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.3 2.5 35 0 0
2016 3.8 2.7 36 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · TX · Houston

461 Heating equipment, warm air (i.e., forced air), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seasons-4, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Metals Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Refrigeration & A/C Products Inc., 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daikin Applied 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6068 1,075 FTE
STATE-SIZE Controlled Contamination Services 1,075 FTE
STATE-SIZE Federal Bureau of Prisons 1,072 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1616 WACO 1,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR N and R of Hartville LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Save - Eleele 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Waynesboro (Vaway) 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3045 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Diego Hub (Casdi) 1,074 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lvmpd - Dsd 1,074 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blake Medical Center 1,074 FTE
NAT-SIZE Constellium 1,074 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.