Aftermarket support for (MRO) of aircraft systems: · North Carolina

Goodrich - Customer Service

Monroe, NC · ~164 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goodrich - Customer Service runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aftermarket support for (MRO) of aircraft systems: workplace, earning a grade A.

Goodrich - Customer Service: 0.4 TCR = 11% of Aftermarket support for (MRO) of aircraft systems: BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goodrich - Customer Service safety composite

Goodrich - Customer Service scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Goodrich - Customer Service held a steady TCR band

Goodrich - Customer Service's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Monroe, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO Meggitt Erlanger
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meggitt Erlanger (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Goodrich - Customer Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goodrich - Customer Service averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the Aftermarket support for (MRO) of aircraft systems: BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goodrich - Customer Service TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Goodrich - Customer Service falls in its industry

650 Aftermarket support for (MRO) establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Aftermarket support for (MRO) employers in North Carolina.

Goodrich - Customer Service (164 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Goodrich - Customer Service
Goodrich - Customer Service (164 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Goodrich - Customer Service has more employees than the Aftermarket support for (MRO) of aircraf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · NC · Monroe

650 Aftermarket support for (MRO) of aircraft systems: employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 163 employers in Monroe, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meggitt Erlanger 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Troy OH) 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR UTC Aerospace Systems Major Business Unit 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sensata Technologies, Inc. Attleboro, MA 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Briegan Concrete LLC 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sapona Yarns, LLC 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE 111-115 Thomasville 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE CertainTeed Claremont16 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Plant 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-CHS Union 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-Atrium Health Union 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1108-Atrium Health Union (1108) 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR DynaEnergetics US Inc. (Blum) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR UTC Aerospace Systems Major Business Unit 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Arthur Refinery 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KCP&L - 801 Charlotte 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waco Work Tools Facility 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE 18 Martin 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE TPA - Airport United Airlines Offices 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bryan Center (Txbrn) 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.