Repair and Overhaul Aircraft Wheels and Brakes · California

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Repair and Overhaul Aircraft Wheels and Brakes workplace, earning a grade B.

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman: 3.4 TCR = 76% of Repair and Overhaul Aircraft Wheels and Brakes BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman safety composite

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2017→2018

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman injury rate improved

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman's TCR fell 3.5 from 5.2 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Santa Fe Springs, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/120
  • PHOTO Constant Aviation- C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Constant Aviation- CLI, Interior Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman averages 3.4 TCR (76% of the Repair and Overhaul Aircraft Wheels and Brakes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman falls in its industry

992 Repair and Overhaul Aircraft W establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 120 Repair and Overhaul Aircraft W employers in California.

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman (57 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman
Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman (57 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman has fewer employees than the Repair and Overhaul Aircraft Wheels and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 5.2 1.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

992 Repair and Overhaul Aircraft Wheels and Brakes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Constant Aviation- CLI, Interior Shop 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACS_DULUTH_MN 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support Bullhead City 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - CAL FIRE 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Kiel Dairy Foods Plant 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ACS_DULUTH_MN 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Breakbulk 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trenton Mercer Co Airport 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE HOPE Family Health (Sumner, Westside and Dental Locations) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gerrity Industries 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Aa Admiral Club Jfk B Cc 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMD Industries, Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.