Thrift shops, used merchandise · North Carolina

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont

Charlotte, NC · ~249 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Thrift shops, used merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont: 1.0 TCR = 29% of Thrift shops, used merchandise BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont safety composite

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont: 0.7 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2018

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.7 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 453310 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 29% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #1/31
  • PHOTO 5236 Bryant
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~249 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5236 Bryant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont averages 1.0 TCR (29% of the Thrift shops, used merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2018=1.3 · BLS 3.4

Where Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont falls in its industry

1,556 Thrift shops, used merchandise establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 31 Thrift shops, used merchandise employers in North Carolina.

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont (249 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont
Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont (249 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont has more employees than the Thrift shops, used merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.3 1.3 4 0 0
2016 0.7 0.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

453310 · NC · Charlotte

1,556 Thrift shops, used merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5236 Bryant 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Third Ave 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 50 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 119 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Simply Southern Holdings, LLC 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc.- Charlotte Mill 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goodrich Corporation (Monroe NC) 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fred Anderson Toyota 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Clark State Community College 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Telford 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR FL-01 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR JESCO Maintenance Corp. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tifton (Gatif) 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foss - Seattle Shipyard 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albany NY Cake (Manning Blvd) Plant 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcoer Allentown 249 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.