Kit assembling and packaging services · Iowa

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC

Cedar Rapids, IA · ~173 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Kit assembling and packaging services workplace, earning a grade C.

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC: 2.9 TCR = 112% of Kit assembling and packaging services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC safety composite

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2016→2020

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC injury rate improved

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC's TCR fell 8.0 from 8.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.0 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Cedar Rapids, IA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 112% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Assemblers at McCook
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Assemblers at McCook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC averages 2.9 TCR (112% of the Kit assembling and packaging services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC falls in its industry

228 Kit assembling and packaging s establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Kit assembling and packaging s employers in Iowa.

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC (173 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC
Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC (173 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Goodwill of the Heartland - CRC has more employees than the Kit assembling and packaging services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 3 0 0
2016 8.0 5.3 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · IA · Cedar Rapids

228 Kit assembling and packaging services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 466 employers in Cedar Rapids, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Assemblers at McCook 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Visual Pak Pleasant Prairie 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overnight Labels 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR QPSI Macungie 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE HIAWATHA (IAHIA) 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Services Building 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cedar Rapids Container 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highway Equipment Company dba New Leader Manufacturing 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins (Cedar Rapids IA 400 NE) 6,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids C Ave 6,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRST EXPEDITED INC 3,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Leppinks Spring Lake 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR E.S. Robbins Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eurofins SF Analytical Labs 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sharp Rees-Stealy-LMW 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Methanex USA, LLC 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blythe Construction/Zachary Contruction Joint Venture 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Special Products & Manufacturing 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRC McKercher 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.