Commercial building construction general contractors · Washington

Graham Construction & Management

Seattle, WA · ~183 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Graham Construction & Management runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Graham Construction & Management: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Graham Construction & Management safety composite

Graham Construction & Management scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Graham Construction & Management held a steady TCR band

Graham Construction & Management's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Seattle, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/127
  • PHOTO 1025 - BELFOR Nation…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1025 - BELFOR National Team PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Graham Construction & Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Graham Construction & Management averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Graham Construction & Management TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Graham Construction & Management falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 127 Commercial building constructi employers in Washington.

Graham Construction & Management (183 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Graham Construction & Management
Graham Construction & Management (183 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Graham Construction & Management has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 1.3 0.9 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · WA · Seattle

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1025 - BELFOR National Team PA 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Headquarters 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HC Company, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Orlando 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taggares Fruit Company 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oasis Farm's Inc. 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAS North District 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Compass General Construction 1 LLC 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Gulf Coast Flooring & Services 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Allegion PLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Gregory INTL INC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversified Thermal Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dallas Lighthouse for the Blind 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE It2 - Information Technology 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE 12723 - Racine 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Village at Augsburg 183 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.