Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance · Ohio

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal

Wooster, OH · ~92 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance workplace, earning a grade A.

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal: 1.6 TCR = 35% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal safety composite

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2022→2023

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal injury rate improved

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.4 in 2022 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.4 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Wooster, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/70
  • PHOTO Midwest Sanitary Ser…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Midwest Sanitary Service, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal averages 1.6 TCR (35% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal TCR series: 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal falls in its industry

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 70 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Ohio.

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal (92 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal
Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal (92 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Grammer Logistics Wooster Terminal has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · OH · Wooster

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 133 employers in Wooster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Midwest Sanitary Service, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cryogenic Transportation 64046 Coffeyville 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEL Companies - GA 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Witte Bros. Exchange, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cresco Labs - Yellow Springs 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layer Site 3 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smoot Construction 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio State University 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scaheffler Transmissions LLC 1,907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LuK USA LLC 1,814 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schaeffler Transmission LLC 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR College of Wooster 771 FTE
NAT-TCR Wenatchee HQ - Fish & Wildlife (Location) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lynchburg Family Medicine Center 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vi-Jon, LLC Smyrna TN 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cohoes Paper Machine 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ashley's Cabinets 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE The ART, a hotel 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Progress Environmental, LLC 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Priority Inc 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.