Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) · Michigan

Grand Arbor Group, Inc.

Grand Rapids, MI · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
32.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Arbor Group, Inc. runs at 728% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) workplace, earning a grade F.

Grand Arbor Group, Inc.: 32.8 TCR = 728% of Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Arbor Group, Inc. safety composite

Grand Arbor Group, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 32.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 34.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grand Arbor Group, Inc.: 16.4 → 49.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 49.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2021

Grand Arbor Group, Inc.'s TCR rose 32.8 from 16.4 in 2020 to 49.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 32.8 · 728% of ind

  • DART 34.7 DART
  • RANK #91/91
  • PHOTO Cedar Landscape Main…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cedar Landscape Maintenance (2.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Grand Arbor Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Arbor Group, Inc. averages 32.8 TCR (728% of the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Grand Arbor Group, Inc. TCR series: 2020=16.4 · 2021=49.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Grand Arbor Group, Inc. falls in its industry

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 91 Tree services (e.g., bracing, employers in Michigan.

Grand Arbor Group, Inc. (46 employees, TCR 32.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Arbor Group, Inc.
Grand Arbor Group, Inc. (46 employees, TCR 32.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Grand Arbor Group, Inc. has fewer employees than the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 49.2 34.7 16 1 0
2020 16.4 2.3 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MI · Grand Rapids

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cedar Landscape Maintenance 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR D. Schumacher Landscaping Inc. - Dennisport 29.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Funk Lawn Care 29.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Georgia Right of Way - SSEMC 28.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crossroads for Youth 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON COUNTY YOUTH CENTER 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAY PINES CTR - DHHS 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manoogian Manor 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Country Store Gillette 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Virginia Box), Inc 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weatherpanel, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Embassy Suites Akron Canton Airport 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.