Electric power generation, nuclear · Mississippi

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

Port Gibson, MS · ~779 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station: 0.2 TCR = 17% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station safety composite

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station held a steady TCR band

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Port Gibson, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P49
  • PHOTO Dresden Nuclear Powe…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~779 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dresden Nuclear Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Gulf Nuclear Station averages 0.2 TCR (17% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Grand Gulf Nuclear Station falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (779 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (779 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.2 0.1 2 0 0
2022 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2021 0.3 0.3 3 0 0
2020 0.3 0.1 3 0 0
2019 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2018 0.2 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.3 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · MS · Port Gibson

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dresden Nuclear Power Station 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SBK Seabrook 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Nuclear 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaSalle County Nuclear Generating Station 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE VT Halter Marine 292 Pascagoula 777 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merit Health River Region 781 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Prepared Plant 770 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6072 790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claiborne County Senior Care 89 FTE
NAT-TCR General Metal Finishing 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Elementis SRL 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Martinez Refining Company LLC 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LyondellBasell La Porte Complex 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 316 779 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 320 779 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 321 779 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 332 779 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.