Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking · Colorado

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN

Grand Junction, CO · ~96 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking workplace, earning a grade B.

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN: 3.3 TCR = 74% of Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN safety composite

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN injury rate improved

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.8 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Grand Junction, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 74% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #3/32
  • PHOTO NRO
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NRO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN averages 3.3 TCR (74% of the Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN falls in its industry

3,020 Less Than Truckload General Fr establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 32 Less Than Truckload General Fr employers in Colorado.

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN (96 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN
Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN (96 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Grand Junction CO FXFE-GJN has more employees than the Less Than Truckload General Freight Truc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 5 0 0
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.4 1.2 4 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2020 4.1 1.7 5 0 0
2019 6.1 4.6 8 0 0
2016 4.8 2.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · CO · Grand Junction

3,020 Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NRO 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JBA-ODFL 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6284-HL-CI 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mid-Atlantic Transport 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lookout Center 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rice Lake West 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pierson's Concrete Construction CO 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copeland Enterprises, Inc. dba Copeland Precast, Inc. 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Oxford Location 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S10045 - Aloha Disposal 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S04018 - Charlotte North Hauling 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S04269 - Charlotte West Hauling 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Irvine CA FXFE-IVN 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Monroe 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0618 Philadelphia 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE CORMETECH - Kings Mountain Facility 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.