Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics · Colorado

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center

Grand Junction, CO · ~27 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics workplace, earning a grade A.

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center: 1.3 TCR = 34% of Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center safety composite

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center held a steady TCR band

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Grand Junction, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Collom & Carney Clin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Collom & Carney Clinic Association (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Junction Endoscopy Center averages 1.3 TCR (34% of the Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Grand Junction Endoscopy Center falls in its industry

498 Freestanding ambulatory surgic establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Freestanding ambulatory surgic employers in Colorado.

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center (27 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Junction Endoscopy Center
Grand Junction Endoscopy Center (27 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Grand Junction Endoscopy Center has fewer employees than the Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · CO · Grand Junction

498 Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Collom & Carney Clinic Association 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Endoscopy Center of West Central Ohio, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centennial Medical Plaza 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AKDHC Phoenix 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Colorado City 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Agricultural Management, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bohler Well Service LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE white river electric associaiton 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Atl1-Dwh-Atlanta Division 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nestle Nutrition 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Cutter # 55 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Public Services Utilities Maintenance 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iowa DOT - Waterloo Garage 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iowa DOT - Grimes Garage 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iowa DOT - Coralville Garage 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.