Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Colorado

Grand Junction WECO

Grand Junction, CO · ~88 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Junction WECO runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Grand Junction WECO: 2.4 TCR = 112% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Junction WECO safety composite

Grand Junction WECO scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grand Junction WECO: 0.9 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2019

Grand Junction WECO's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.9 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Grand Junction, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 112% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #22/46
  • PHOTO 09 Grand Island
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 09 Grand Island (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Grand Junction WECO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Junction WECO averages 2.4 TCR (112% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Junction WECO TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=2 · 2019=4.6 · BLS 2.1

Where Grand Junction WECO falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 46 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Colorado.

Grand Junction WECO (88 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Junction WECO
Grand Junction WECO (88 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Grand Junction WECO has more employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.6 2.8 5 0 0
2018 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2016 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CO · Grand Junction

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 09 Grand Island 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.A. Collins Maintenance Shop 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMC-W Knox 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fallsway Equipment - Akron 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arvada North Metro HQ-057 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Poudre Valley REA, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGL Construction Company 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&C Foundations, Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Tops 272 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hazard Service Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Wayne NE Service Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Community & Economic Development 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE LAICO Industries and Classified Shredding Services 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops 248 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Florence Nursing Home 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Affiliated Construction Services, Inc. 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.