'Vending Machine Operators · Michigan

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch

Grand Rapids, MI · ~56 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch runs at 321% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 'Vending Machine Operators workplace, earning a grade F.

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch: 10.9 TCR = 321% of 'Vending Machine Operators BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch safety composite

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch injury rate improved

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch's TCR fell 2.1 from 17.2 in 2016 to 15.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 18.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.2 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=15.0 · 2019=18.4 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=15.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454210 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 321% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Port Washington Pantry
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Port Washington Pantry (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Rapids, Mi Branch averages 10.9 TCR (321% of the 'Vending Machine Operators BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch TCR series: 2016=17.2 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=15 · 2019=18.4 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=15.1 · BLS 3.4

Where Grand Rapids, Mi Branch falls in its industry

311 'Vending Machine Operators establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 'Vending Machine Operators employers in Michigan.

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch (56 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 7.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Rapids, Mi Branch
Grand Rapids, Mi Branch (56 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 7.1

Grand Rapids, Mi Branch has more employees than the 'Vending Machine Operators median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.1 8.6 7 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 12.7 10.1 5 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2020 8.6 2.9 3 0 0
2019 18.4 16.6 10 0 0
2018 15.0 11.2 8 0 0
2017 5.8 3.9 3 0 0
2016 17.2 10.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454210 · MI · Grand Rapids

311 'Vending Machine Operators employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Port Washington Pantry 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WARSAW, IN BRANCH 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CINCINNATI, OH BRANCH 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CANTEEN FREMONT 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE John B Schaendorf Dairy 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamtramck Energy Services 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. Lindberg & Sons Inc. 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipparrone Contracting Inc 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Buzick Lumber and Home Center 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR D1 Joliet Yard 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kimberton Whole Foods Downingtown 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bowling Green Shuttle 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Eagle Point School District 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Epcot Discovery Diner 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ginger Hill 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Coast Distribution Center 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.