Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

Grand Villa

Grand Junction, CO · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Villa runs at 345% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Grand Villa: 13.1 TCR = 345% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Villa safety composite

Grand Villa scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grand Villa: 17.3 → 19.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 28.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Grand Villa's TCR rose 2.0 from 17.3 in 2016 to 19.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 28.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Grand Junction, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 345% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #116/140
  • PHOTO Berwick Estates
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Berwick Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Grand Villa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Villa averages 13.1 TCR (345% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Villa TCR series: 2016=17.3 · 2017=28.3 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=19.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Grand Villa falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #116 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Grand Villa (36 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Villa
Grand Villa (36 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Grand Villa has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 19.3 0.0 5 0 0
2022 10.2 0.0 3 0 0
2021 9.8 6.5 3 0 0
2020 9.5 6.4 3 0 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.2 0.0 2 0 0
2017 28.3 7.1 8 0 0
2016 17.3 8.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Grand Junction

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Berwick Estates 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-XII Ridgefield LLC 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens of Statesville 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Horizons Village 13.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Core-Tech Wireline Services, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Volumetrics Measurement 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Limon Wind Plant 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1091 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 55506 Phoenix 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Goettl's High Desert Mechanical, Inc. 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Spokane, Wa #00296 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE allnex USA, Inc - Langley 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Mechanical Services LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office Tennessee 300 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&B Electrical Contractors of Florida, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.