Telecommunications carriers, wired · Texas

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton

Belton, TX · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton runs at 646% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton: 4.5 TCR = 646% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton safety composite

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.6

2022→2024

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton injury rate improved

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton's TCR fell 13.6 from 13.6 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=13.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Belton, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 646% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #58/61
  • PHOTO Liberty Luquillo
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Liberty Luquillo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton averages 4.5 TCR (646% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton TCR series: 2022=13.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 61 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in Texas.

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton (21 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton
Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton (21 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Belton has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 13.6 13.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · TX · Belton

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 51 employers in Belton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Liberty Luquillo 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Cabo Rojo CO 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Santurce CO 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cox Communication - OKC- 10th St Campus 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grass Roots Farming LLC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dawn Cattle Feeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Lakes Dairy LP 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP TEXAS MAINT 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1232 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1232 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXBEL - BELTON CENTER 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Crest Hospital 263 FTE
NAT-TCR 005 Viejo San Juan 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WBP 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Meadowview Rehab and Nursing 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR M&M Service Company - Litchfield FS 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE LO Agronomy 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE M&M Auto Parts, Inc - Mmst 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinton Store Career Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holy Family Home Care 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.