Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Granite Gate Senior Living

Prescott, AZ · ~62 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Granite Gate Senior Living runs at 286% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Granite Gate Senior Living: 10.9 TCR = 286% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Granite Gate Senior Living safety composite

Granite Gate Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2018→2024

Granite Gate Senior Living injury rate improved

Granite Gate Senior Living's TCR fell 3.0 from 9.2 in 2018 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.2 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Prescott, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 286% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #114/173
  • PHOTO Ivy Lodge
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ivy Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Granite Gate Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Granite Gate Senior Living averages 10.9 TCR (286% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Granite Gate Senior Living TCR series: 2018=9.2 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Granite Gate Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #114 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Granite Gate Senior Living (62 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Granite Gate Senior Living
Granite Gate Senior Living (62 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Granite Gate Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 6.2 3 0 0
2023 15.4 9.6 8 0 0
2022 12.6 8.4 6 0 0
2018 9.2 9.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Prescott

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 105 employers in Prescott, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ivy Lodge 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santianna 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roslyn Harbor 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63134 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Story of AZ - Watkins 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8768-SRP NGS 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Office 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yavapai County 9,743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yavapai County - Gov 1,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yavapai Regional Medical Center-West 1,083 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Prescott 552 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Belvidere Fire Department 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR POSC operating out of the HealthPlex 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairway View Neighborhoods 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn & Convention Center 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dixie Electric Cooperative 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mulberry Martin Transport 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Meadow Store 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scrufari Construction Company, LLC 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.