Electric power generation, hydroelectric · Washington

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production

Ephrata, WA · ~223 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production runs at 332% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production: 4.0 TCR = 332% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production safety composite

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production: 3.4 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2024

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production's TCR rose 1.0 from 3.4 in 2022 to 4.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Ephrata, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.0 · 332% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #17/25
  • PHOTO Faraday
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Faraday (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production averages 4.0 TCR (332% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production TCR series: 2022=3.4 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 25 Electric power generation, hyd employers in Washington.

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production (223 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production
Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production (223 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Grant County PUD #2 - Power Production has more employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 3.4 9 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 8 1 0
2022 3.4 1.3 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · WA · Ephrata

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 17 employers in Ephrata, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Faraday 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bayfront Steam Plant-5D 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 44A - Osage Energy Ctr Gen and Bud 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYSEG Lockport 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stemilt Growers, LLC. - NDC / Fresh Cube 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trojan Lithograph Renton 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alaskan Copper 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE OE Puyallup 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grant County PUD#2 - Administration 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3260 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3260 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration-Support Personnel 245 FTE
NAT-TCR Bk 3993 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 8225 BR SNF, LLC dba Center Point Health Care and Rehab 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Express - MTM Madison, AL 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ameri-Kleen - Tennessee Branch 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5064 Kaleida Erie County Medical Center 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carter Express - Laredo, TX 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Madison 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield South Il - 3293 223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.