Skilled nursing facilities · California

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center

Mountain View, CA · ~159 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
30.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center runs at 464% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center: 30.1 TCR = 464% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 30.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center: 15.2 → 45.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 45.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.06× in 2020

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 29.9 from 15.2 in 2019 to 45.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mountain View, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 30.1 · 464% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #739/739
  • PHOTO Andover Manor Rehab …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center averages 30.1 TCR (464% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2019=15.2 · 2020=45.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #739 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center (159 employees, TCR 30.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center
Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center (159 employees, TCR 30.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Grant Cuesta Sub-acute and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 45.1 1.7 10 42 0
2019 15.2 8.5 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Mountain View

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 151 employers in Mountain View, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Shook Home 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 226_338 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-752 29.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Police Department 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lido House, Autograph Collection 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of San Marino 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Painting & Construction 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waymo HQ 1,846 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waymo RLS 1,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30806) 1,158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-30331) 999 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0004-Huntersville Oaks 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cargill Agricultural Supply Chain - Gainesville 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE US173: Pittsburgh 546 - SG 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE life care center of Yuma 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.