Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) · New York

Grasshopper Gardens Inc

Gansevoort, NY · ~110 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grasshopper Gardens Inc runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) workplace, earning a grade D.

Grasshopper Gardens Inc: 6.1 TCR = 136% of Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grasshopper Gardens Inc safety composite

Grasshopper Gardens Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Grasshopper Gardens Inc held a steady TCR band

Grasshopper Gardens Inc's TCR held near 0.1 from 6.2 in 2023 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=6.2 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Gansevoort, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 136% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #63/92
  • PHOTO Marlin Landscape
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marlin Landscape (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Grasshopper Gardens Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grasshopper Gardens Inc averages 6.1 TCR (136% of the Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grasshopper Gardens Inc TCR series: 2023=6.2 · 2024=6 · BLS 4.5

Where Grasshopper Gardens Inc falls in its industry

2,875 Seasonal property maintenance establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 92 Seasonal property maintenance employers in New York.

Grasshopper Gardens Inc (110 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grasshopper Gardens Inc
Grasshopper Gardens Inc (110 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Grasshopper Gardens Inc has more employees than the Seasonal property maintenance services ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 5.2 7 0 0
2023 6.2 6.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · NY · Gansevoort

2,875 Seasonal property maintenance services (i.e., snow plowing in winter, landscaping during other seasons) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 9 employers in Gansevoort, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marlin Landscape 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broyles Landscaping 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Perspectives 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chapel Valley Landscape - Atlanta 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Ithaca 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE S WATERTOWN SERV CENTER BLDG A-NYAF 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE GCT JV Constructors 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eldor Contracting Corp 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubricky Construction Corp 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stone Bridge Iron & Steel Inc. 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR AllPro Restoration & Janitorial 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Triple B Cleaning, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Sdabe - Aberdeen 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Utslc - Salt Lake City 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelin - Lincoln 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sorter Construction, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ice Cream Specialties 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE 725 Wentzville 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE KO Management LLC 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Air Handling 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.