Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Massachusetts

Grattan Line Construction

Billerica, MA · ~59 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grattan Line Construction runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Grattan Line Construction: 1.2 TCR = 42% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grattan Line Construction safety composite

Grattan Line Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Grattan Line Construction held a steady TCR band

Grattan Line Construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Billerica, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/31
  • PHOTO STURGEON ELECTRIC CA…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: STURGEON ELECTRIC CALIFORNIA, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Grattan Line Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grattan Line Construction averages 1.2 TCR (42% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grattan Line Construction TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Grattan Line Construction falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 31 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Massachusetts.

Grattan Line Construction (59 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Grattan Line Construction
Grattan Line Construction (59 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Grattan Line Construction has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MA · Billerica

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 89 employers in Billerica, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR STURGEON ELECTRIC CALIFORNIA, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division #16 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydaker-Wheatlake - MI Gas Division 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaumont Office 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Brookdale Ave 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structures Derek International sa 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ballard - Mid-Atlantic 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE MP Masonry, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR EMD Serono Research And Development Institute 608 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quanterix Headquarters 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bruker Scientific LLC 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Digital Solutions : MS - Billerica, MA 342 FTE
NAT-TCR RRS Fostoria 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Municipio Las Marias (Manejo De Emergencias) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Fabrication Company 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nox-Crete, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE L.A. Turbine 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quest Industries, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE S07556 - Gasmer Drive MRF 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.