Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber · Indiana

Great Lakes Forest Products

Elkhart, IN · ~265 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Forest Products runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade B.

Great Lakes Forest Products: 1.9 TCR = 56% of Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Forest Products safety composite

Great Lakes Forest Products scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Great Lakes Forest Products injury rate improved

Great Lakes Forest Products's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.1 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Elkhart, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 56% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Hiland Wood Products…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~265 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hiland Wood Products Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Forest Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Forest Products averages 1.9 TCR (56% of the Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Forest Products TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.1 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Great Lakes Forest Products falls in its industry

178 Boards, wood, resawing purchas establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Boards, wood, resawing purchas employers in Indiana.

Great Lakes Forest Products (265 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Forest Products
Great Lakes Forest Products (265 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Great Lakes Forest Products has more employees than the Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.3 4 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 1.5 0.9 5 0 0
2020 1.1 0.4 1 2 0
2019 2.9 2.5 7 0 0
2018 2.1 1.4 6 0 0
2017 1.7 0.0 4 0 0
2016 3.0 1.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · IN · Elkhart

178 Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 401 employers in Elkhart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hiland Wood Products Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Hardwoods, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Cut Stock, Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 06500 - CAROLINA ART & FRAME 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tonn and Blank Construction, LLC 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer 120 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAMMOND/EAST LAKE (INHAM) 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sabic-IP Mt. Vernon 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR THOR MOTOR COACH 2,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR HRV LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR Overhead Door Company Cincinnati 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodfield Trucking 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FERMA Field (So Cal) 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mediacom 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kontoor Brands 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Triton Brands, Inc. Product Supply - Mecosta 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE WB Moore Company 265 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.