Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage

Savage, MN · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage: 2.7 TCR = 71% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage safety composite

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2022→2023

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage injury rate improved

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage's TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Savage, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/240
  • PHOTO Arboretum
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arboretum (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage averages 2.7 TCR (71% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage TCR series: 2022=5.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage (38 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage
Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage (38 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Savage has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.4 5.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Savage

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 63 employers in Savage, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arboretum 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Onslow House 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Statesman Club, Embark at 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AHC Sterling House of Harbison LLC 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pine Tree Orchard 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE LB Pork Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foley Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2528-Glyndon, MN (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1833 - Savage 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savage - Main Store 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN Plant 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Savage 180 FTE
NAT-TCR Skyworks LLC -- Nashville branch 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sullivan Builders, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Commonwealth Home Health Care Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Department 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Finnmark Property Services-PDX 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Broadwind Industrial Solutions 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Micro Manufacturing Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howe & Howe, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.