Residential property managing · Minnesota

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka

Minnetonka, MN · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.3
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka runs at 1521% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential property managing workplace, earning a grade F.

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka: 21.3 TCR = 1521% of Residential property managing BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka safety composite

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2017→2020

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka injury rate improved

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka's TCR fell 7.4 from 25.0 in 2017 to 17.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 25.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=25.0 · 2020=17.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Minnetonka, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.3 · 1521% of ind

  • DART 11.7 DART
  • RANK #25/26
  • PHOTO Grace Haven Assisted…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grace Haven Assisted Living & Memory Care (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka averages 21.3 TCR (1521% of the Residential property managing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka TCR series: 2017=25 · 2020=17.6 · BLS 1.4

Where Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka falls in its industry

500 Residential property managing establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 26 Residential property managing employers in Minnesota.

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka (21 employees, TCR 21.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka
Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka (21 employees, TCR 21.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka has fewer employees than the Residential property managing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 17.6 11.7 1 2 0
2017 25.0 12.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · MN · Minnetonka

500 Residential property managing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 179 employers in Minnetonka, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grace Haven Assisted Living & Memory Care 21.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Good Samaritan Society Kissimmee Village 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR C-R Management Co 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HTG Management, LLC 20.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Winthrop Agronomy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donahues Greenhouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE M7 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNLOG-SEL-SEL MN LOGISTICS' 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN008 1,873 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Marsh 1,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN006 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN006 MINNETONKA-9800 HEALTH CARE LN 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Haggerty Healthcare LLC dba Los Arcos Del Norte 21.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CAN019 21.3 TCR
NAT-TCR VH Foods Inc dba Outside The Breadbox 21.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Two Men and a Truck 21.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lancaster - LEC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Inn Burlington Williston 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Exterminators Midtown HSC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Exterminators Raleigh 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.