Medical Device Component Manufacturer · Minnesota

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical

Minneapolis, MN · ~224 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Medical Device Component Manufacturer workplace, earning a grade C.

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Medical Device Component Manufacturer BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical safety composite

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2024

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical injury rate improved

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical's TCR fell 0.8 from 3.9 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.9 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #8/27
  • PHOTO Brainin
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brainin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Medical Device Component Manufacturer BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical TCR series: 2018=3.9 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical falls in its industry

477 Medical Device Component Manuf establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 27 Medical Device Component Manuf employers in Minnesota.

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical (224 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical
Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical (224 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Greatbatch Ltd. dba Greatbatch Medical has more employees than the Medical Device Component Manufacturer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 2.2 3 4 0
2018 3.9 2.6 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · MN · Minneapolis

477 Medical Device Component Manufacturer employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brainin 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greatbatch Ltd. (dba Greatbatch Medical) 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ward Manufacturing Co.-Evanston 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rieke Corporation- Auburn 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riverside 2700 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connexus Energy 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reckitt (MeadJohnson LLC) 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Print and Visual Impressions - Fridley MN - 0223-MNFR1 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Aguila Food Distribution LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Riddle Surgical Center, LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - Kingsport 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR John Deere Ottumwa Works 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Common Links Construction, LLC 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Immaculata University 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Duke Inn & Golf Club 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 125 Business Park 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.