Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses · Wisconsin

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing

Green Bay, WI · ~393 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade D.

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing: 5.6 TCR = 170% of Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing safety composite

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing held a steady TCR band

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing's TCR held near 0.2 from 5.7 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 170% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #32/52
  • PHOTO 80648-MEAT PLANT-SA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~393 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 80648-MEAT PLANT-SA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing averages 5.6 TCR (170% of the Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing falls in its industry

613 Boxed meat produced from purch establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 52 Boxed meat produced from purch employers in Wisconsin.

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing (393 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing
Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing (393 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Green Bay Dressed Beef East River Processing has more employees than the Boxed meat produced from purchased carca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 5.5 4.9 22 5 0
2016 5.7 4.9 24 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · WI · Green Bay

613 Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 80648-MEAT PLANT-SA 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boar's Head - New Castle 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 304 Colorado Meats 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birchwood Foods 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 2828 393 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hudson Hospital 393 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Clearing Inc. 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kwik Trip Bakery 779 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR C2300 - C-2 Medford 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nassau (Nynas) 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeshore 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LifeScape Adult Services Western 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tupelo Operations 393 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simonton Windows: Ellenboro, WV 393 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schneider Electric USA 393 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field Sales Central 393 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.