Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses · Wisconsin

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing

Green Bay, WI · ~416 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade D.

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing: 4.1 TCR = 124% of Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing safety composite

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing injury rate improved

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing's TCR fell 1.5 from 5.5 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.5 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 124% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #28/52
  • PHOTO Smithfield Foods
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 156 inj
  • SIZE ~416 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smithfield Foods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing averages 4.1 TCR (124% of the Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing falls in its industry

613 Boxed meat produced from purch establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 52 Boxed meat produced from purch employers in Wisconsin.

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing (416 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing
Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing (416 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Green Bay Dressed Beef Processing has more employees than the Boxed meat produced from purchased carca median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 3.2 19 1 0
2023 4.8 4.3 23 0 0
2022 3.8 3.4 19 0 0
2021 3.3 3.1 16 0 0
2020 3.1 2.5 15 0 0
2019 3.9 2.7 19 1 0
2018 4.4 3.8 23 0 0
2017 5.5 4.9 22 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · WI · Green Bay

613 Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smithfield Foods 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mrs. Ressler's Food Products Company 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SQUARE-H BRANDS, INC. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magic City Foods 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grunau Company Inc. 416 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2452 416 FTE
STATE-SIZE WIAPP017 ASCENSION NE WI - MERCY CAMPUS 416 FTE
STATE-SIZE PBN NextEra Energy Point Beach LLC 415 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR C047 Bloomington 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Speco Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NEWBERRY 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Beverage 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE A102 -Antech Lab Fountain Valley (fka Irvine) 416 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metra Electronics Corporation - FL 416 FTE
NAT-SIZE CoServ Elecrtic 416 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Walton Hospital 416 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.