Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Minnesota

Green Bay Packaging Inc.

Minneapolis, MN · ~162 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Packaging Inc. runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Green Bay Packaging Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 81% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Packaging Inc. safety composite

Green Bay Packaging Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2024

Green Bay Packaging Inc. injury rate improved

Green Bay Packaging Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 3.5 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 81% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #19/30
  • PHOTO SupplyOne Tucson
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~162 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SupplyOne Tucson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Packaging Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Packaging Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (81% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Packaging Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Packaging Inc. falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 30 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Minnesota.

Green Bay Packaging Inc. (162 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Packaging Inc.
Green Bay Packaging Inc. (162 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Green Bay Packaging Inc. has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 1 0
2023 1.9 1.3 3 0 0
2022 3.8 2.5 6 0 0
2021 1.8 1.4 4 0 0
2020 3.3 2.8 6 0 0
2019 2.2 1.1 4 0 0
2018 3.4 0.6 6 0 0
2017 3.5 1.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MN · Minneapolis

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SupplyOne Tucson 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encorr Sheets, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blackhawk Corrugated LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Container 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Pattern Co., Inc. 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Massman Villard 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE COTTAGE GROVE MN - 3114 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lunds - Apple Valley 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Service Wire Company Houston 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Leevers Foods Cavalier 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ElPaso TX 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dillsboro IN 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parkwest Casino 580 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kentucky Personnel Cabinet 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Snohomish County 911 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Bonita Supermarkets #4 162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.