Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Ohio

Green Bay Packaging Inc.

Fremont, OH · ~134 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Packaging Inc. runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Green Bay Packaging Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Packaging Inc. safety composite

Green Bay Packaging Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2024

Green Bay Packaging Inc. injury rate improved

Green Bay Packaging Inc.'s TCR fell 6.3 from 7.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Fremont, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #56/109
  • PHOTO Smurfit Kappa - Fort…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smurfit Kappa - Fort Worth (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Packaging Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Packaging Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Packaging Inc. TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Packaging Inc. falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 109 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Ohio.

Green Bay Packaging Inc. (134 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Packaging Inc.
Green Bay Packaging Inc. (134 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Green Bay Packaging Inc. has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 2.6 1.9 4 0 0
2022 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2021 2.8 1.4 4 0 0
2020 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2016 7.0 5.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · OH · Fremont

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 90 employers in Fremont, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smurfit Kappa - Fort Worth 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multiwall Packaging - Gary 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amatech Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE RRSC Home Office 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vm Systems Inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perfection Group, Inc., Cincinnati 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Columbus Interior (582) 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crown Battery Manufacturing Company - Fremont Manufacturing Location 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABC INOAC Exterior Systems, LLC. Fremont 444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital 363 FTE
NAT-TCR Crown-Kinston Equipment Company 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkersburg- Dry Bulk Transport 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Par A Dice 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Square Deal Machining Inc. 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE SWF Industrial 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversicare of Bessemer 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin Metal LLC 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.