Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) · Vermont

Green Mountain Transit

Name: Green Mountain Transit Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Burlington, VT · ~124 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 4.2
Avg TCR: 4.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Mountain Transit runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) workplace, earning a grade C.

Green Mountain Transit: 4.2 TCR = 92% of Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Mountain Transit safety composite

Green Mountain Transit scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers
DART rate: D 4.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Green Mountain Transit: 3.7 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2018

Green Mountain Transit's TCR rose 1.0 from 3.7 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485113 · Burlington, VT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 92% of ind

DART 4.7 DART
RANK #2/4
PHOTO 2662-7002
BOOK 2y book
INJ 11 inj
SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2662-7002 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Vermont employers → · Look up another →

This site

4.2
2662-7002

4.2
6091-516

4.2
2662-7030

4.2
2662-7047

4.2

What this shows Green Mountain Transit averages 4.2 TCR (92% of the Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) BLS benchmark).

Green Mountain Transit TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2018=4.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Green Mountain Transit falls in its industry

332 Bus transit systems (except mi establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Vermont alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Bus transit systems (except mi employers in Vermont.

Green Mountain Transit (124 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Green Mountain Transit has more employees than the Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	4.7	4.7	6	0	0
2016	3.7	3.7	5	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485113 · VT · Burlington

332 Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,065 rated employers in Vermont with headcount on file · 96 employers in Burlington, VT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	2662-7002	GREENSBURG, PA	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	6091-516	GARDEN CITY, NY	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	2662-7030	NEWARK, OH	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	2662-7047	SPRINGFIELD, VA	4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	8162	MORRISVILLE	124 FTE
STATE-SIZE	RUT	RUTLAND	124 FTE
STATE-SIZE	2253-N0995	BURLINGTON	124 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Elderwood at Burlington	BURLINGTON	124 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Howard Center Inc	Burlington	1,483 FTE
CITY-NEAR	102 South Winooski	Burlington	529 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1138 Pine	Burlington	452 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Burton Corporation	Burlington	414 FTE
NAT-TCR	Autoneum	Oregon, OH	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Lighting & Construction Services, Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	1484 - Houma	Houma, LA	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	001 TRC Corporate Office	Steamboat Springs, CO	4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	377 Dnd - Worcester	Worcester, MA	124 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hc128-128-Rochester Rlc	Rochester, MN	124 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The Bradford Rehabilitation Center	Shreveport, LA	124 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Paramount Senior Care Centers at Pasadena	Pasadena, TX	124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.