Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Kansas

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti

Leoti, KS · ~57 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti: 5.9 TCR = 131% of Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti safety composite

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2020

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti injury rate improved

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti's TCR fell 2.0 from 4.6 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Leoti, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 131% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #25/50
  • PHOTO Ward Feed Yard
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ward Feed Yard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti averages 5.9 TCR (131% of the Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti falls in its industry

165 Cattle feedlots (except stocky establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 50 Cattle feedlots (except stocky employers in Kansas.

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti (57 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti
Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti (57 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Green Plains Cattle Company, LLC- Leoti has more employees than the Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2019 8.1 5.4 6 0 0
2018 8.3 8.3 6 0 0
2017 4.6 2.3 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · KS · Leoti

165 Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 7 employers in Leoti, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ward Feed Yard 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Valle Sabbia, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Plains Cattle Company LLC - kismet 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cri Feeders of Guymon, LLC 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Leoti 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Simpson Construction Services 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Underground Systems Construction, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weddle and Sons, Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wichita County Health Center 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR SEABOARD FOODS LP LEOTI FM DELIVERY 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR LEOTI FM & DELIVERY 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR SEABOARD FOODS LP CELL 6 LOADOUT 32 FTE
NAT-TCR Country Mart #2436 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Upper Deerfield Shoprite 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmony Learning Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR RSW-1481 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morries MAG Management 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quantum Electric Corp 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roadrunner Transportation Services - Downers Grove 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITC Austin Texas 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.