Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Minnesota

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center

Plainview, MN · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade A.

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center: 1.6 TCR = 24% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center safety composite

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2023→2024

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center injury rate improved

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Plainview, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/430
  • PHOTO Benton House of Narc…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benton House of Narcoossee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Prairie Rehabilation Center averages 1.6 TCR (24% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center TCR series: 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Green Prairie Rehabilation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 430 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Minnesota.

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center (74 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Prairie Rehabilation Center
Green Prairie Rehabilation Center (74 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Green Prairie Rehabilation Center has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Plainview

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 10 employers in Plainview, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Benton House of Narcoossee 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilton Manors Health & Rehab. Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norwood Towers Healthcare LLC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pawtucket Falls SNF Operations 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Winthrop 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Memorial Foundation., dba Gil-Mor Manor and Gil-Mor Haven 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Specialty Surgery Center 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro Home Insulation 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Foods, Inc. 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Foods Plainview 203 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bruce Kreofsky and Sons 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bruce Kreofsky & Sons, Inc 93 FTE
NAT-TCR PLC Trenching Co., Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Miint - Canadian International Bldg 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR C&C Pumping Services, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Havtech Solutions, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE ufp Folkston LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckley & Co INC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rowland 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kyhpv - Hopkinsville Center 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.