Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC

Green Valley, AZ · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC: 8.4 TCR = 222% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC safety composite

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC: 5.7 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2024

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC's TCR rose 5.5 from 5.7 in 2023 to 11.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Green Valley, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 222% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #83/173
  • PHOTO Redbud
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Redbud (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC averages 8.4 TCR (222% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC TCR series: 2023=5.7 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC (43 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC
Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC (43 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Green Valley Memory Associates, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 11.2 4 0 0
2023 5.7 5.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Green Valley

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 20 employers in Green Valley, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Redbud 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Forum at Town center Village 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Country Charm 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Demaree Crossing 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Excelsior Mining AZ 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Junction 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMS Construction, LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrity Building Corp 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR La Posada at Park Centre 611 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1411 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1411 355 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0017-0017-02044 FAC-02044-GREEN VALLEY-AZ 115 FTE
NAT-TCR Catelli Brothers Family of Foods 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Staypineapple, Midtown New York 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nymae - Metro Queens 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hihlu - Honolulu Building 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chicago 10247 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chattanooga 10010 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheektowaga 10235 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE James Candy Company, LLC 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.