Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) · Wisconsin

Greenco Industries

Monroe, WI · ~116 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenco Industries runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) workplace, earning a grade B.

Greenco Industries: 2.9 TCR = 77% of Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenco Industries safety composite

Greenco Industries scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Greenco Industries held a steady TCR band

Greenco Industries's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Monroe, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/60
  • PHOTO Futures Unlimited, I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Futures Unlimited, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Greenco Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenco Industries averages 2.9 TCR (77% of the Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenco Industries TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=3 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Greenco Industries falls in its industry

1,455 Sheltered workshops (i.e., wor establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 60 Sheltered workshops (i.e., wor employers in Wisconsin.

Greenco Industries (116 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenco Industries
Greenco Industries (116 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Greenco Industries has more employees than the Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experien median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.3 1.7 2 0 0
2022 5.3 1.8 3 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2020 8.8 8.8 6 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · WI · Monroe

1,455 Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 43 employers in Monroe, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Futures Unlimited, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allen Park Rehab 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RISE Community Services 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pleasant Prarie Power Plant 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Traffic & Restoration, LLC 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleary Building Corporation 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tomah Processing 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR CB Monroe 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Clinic Hospital 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCDC Monroe 625 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Truck Equipment 465 FTE
NAT-TCR Wetherington Tractor Service, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McAllen 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Building Systems Corp 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hank's Excavating & Landscaping, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willie Itule Produce, Inc. 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Appomattox Operation 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villa Lighting Supply 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Ursinus College Wismer 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.