Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing · Ohio

Greenfield Research, Inc.

Greenfield, OH · ~166 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenfield Research, Inc. runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Greenfield Research, Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 86% of Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenfield Research, Inc. safety composite

Greenfield Research, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2017

Greenfield Research, Inc. injury rate improved

Greenfield Research, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.3 from 5.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Greenfield, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/38
  • PHOTO O'Brien Steel Servic…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: O'Brien Steel Service- Congerville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Greenfield Research, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenfield Research, Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (86% of the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenfield Research, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Greenfield Research, Inc. falls in its industry

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 38 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut employers in Ohio.

Greenfield Research, Inc. (166 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenfield Research, Inc.
Greenfield Research, Inc. (166 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Greenfield Research, Inc. has more employees than the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.0 3.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · OH · Greenfield

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 13 employers in Greenfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR O'Brien Steel Service- Congerville 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stainless Fabrication Inc 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aero Transportation Products 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patrick Fabricating and Welding, Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corso's Flower and Garden Center 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Garber Electrical Contractors 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermal Solutions Company Wide 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huron 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adient Greenfield 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adena Greenfield Medical Center 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corvac Greenfield 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenfield Products, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-TCR Deep Meadow Correctional Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR GEHC : Westborough MA, LS 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR GREENVILLE 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Scenic Hills Care Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE AUBERGE 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tumwater (Watum) 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Janesville Acoustics - Old Fort 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Health - Pana 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.