Bits, drill, metalworking, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Greenleaf Corporation

Saegertown, PA · ~349 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenleaf Corporation runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bits, drill, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Greenleaf Corporation: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Bits, drill, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenleaf Corporation safety composite

Greenleaf Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Greenleaf Corporation held a steady TCR band

Greenleaf Corporation's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.3 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333515 · Saegertown, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #6/11
  • PHOTO Regal Cutting Tools,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~349 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Regal Cutting Tools, Inc- Loris (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Greenleaf Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenleaf Corporation averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Bits, drill, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenleaf Corporation TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Greenleaf Corporation falls in its industry

221 Bits, drill, metalworking, man establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 11 Bits, drill, metalworking, man employers in Pennsylvania.

Greenleaf Corporation (349 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenleaf Corporation
Greenleaf Corporation (349 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Greenleaf Corporation has more employees than the Bits, drill, metalworking, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.2 1.1 6 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 5 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 4 1 0
2020 3.1 2.2 10 0 0
2019 2.2 1.1 8 0 0
2018 1.9 1.4 6 1 0
2017 1.7 1.4 6 0 0
2016 2.3 1.5 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333515 · PA · Saegertown

221 Bits, drill, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 15 employers in Saegertown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Regal Cutting Tools, Inc- Loris 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jewell Tool Technology 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MI03-UDX-FLUSHING 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monster Tool LLC 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE GERTRUDE HAWK INGREDIENTS 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fujirebio Diagnostics Inc., Malvern 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE HYDAC Technology Corp. 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3495-11DA097 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR LORD Corporation - Saegertown 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maclean Saegertown, LLC 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR MacLean Fogg Component Solutions Saegertown 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saegertown Facility 139 FTE
NAT-TCR City Of Olivia 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR enTouch Systems, Inc-Richmond 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MG Constructors & Engineers INC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Boston's Restaurant & Sports Bar 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wamego Work Tools 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeMontrond Auto Group 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primex Farms 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE GC America Inc. 349 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.