Swimming pools · South Carolina

Greenville County Parks and Recreation

Greenville, SC · ~448 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenville County Parks and Recreation runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Swimming pools workplace, earning a grade B.

Greenville County Parks and Recreation: 2.1 TCR = 67% of Swimming pools BLS 3.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenville County Parks and Recreation safety composite

Greenville County Parks and Recreation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Greenville County Parks and Recreation: 1.1 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.37× in 2024

Greenville County Parks and Recreation's TCR rose 1.7 from 1.1 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713940 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 67% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Two Marks Decatur, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~448 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Two Marks Decatur, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greenville County Parks and Recreation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenville County Parks and Recreation averages 2.1 TCR (67% of the Swimming pools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenville County Parks and Recreation TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=2 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.1

Where Greenville County Parks and Recreation falls in its industry

629 Swimming pools establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Swimming pools employers in South Carolina.

Greenville County Parks and Recreation (448 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenville County Parks and Recreation
Greenville County Parks and Recreation (448 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Greenville County Parks and Recreation has more employees than the Swimming pools median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 5 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 6 0 0
2018 3.8 1.9 6 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713940 · SC · Greenville

629 Swimming pools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Two Marks Decatur, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PF Nolensville Fitness, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR United PF TOM, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 64 Woodland 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JTEKT North America 447 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cowpens - 600 Webber Road 447 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCLEOD-LORIS COMMUNITY HOSP 449 FTE
STATE-SIZE SIMPSONVILLE MEDICAL CAMPUS 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Decatur Fresh Hatchery 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pope Scientific, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rapiscan Systems Conventional Mfg Facility 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR T & T Trucking, Inc. - Bakersfield Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Paul Homes 448 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Petersburg General Hospital 448 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckeye Valley Family YMCA 448 FTE
NAT-SIZE icon Mechanical LLC 448 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.