General warehousing and storage · South Carolina

Greenville Distribution Center

Woodruff, SC · ~77 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenville Distribution Center runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Greenville Distribution Center: 1.1 TCR = 18% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenville Distribution Center safety composite

Greenville Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Greenville Distribution Center held a steady TCR band

Greenville Distribution Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Woodruff, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/160
  • PHOTO West Georgia Csc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Georgia Csc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greenville Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenville Distribution Center averages 1.1 TCR (18% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenville Distribution Center TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Greenville Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 160 General warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

Greenville Distribution Center (77 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenville Distribution Center
Greenville Distribution Center (77 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Greenville Distribution Center has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Woodruff

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 10 employers in Woodruff, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Georgia Csc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schneider Electric - Southern Distribution Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR tkA-Plainfield 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairburn - 5000-B Bohannon Road 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Laurens CPW 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.R. Hipp Construction, Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE US175: Charleston, SC 210 - SG 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Covercraft Industries - Landrum 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warehouse Services, Inc. Woodruff 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodruff Manor 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02680 - STORE # 2680 WOODRUFF 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR WSI - Woodruff 091 71 FTE
NAT-TCR Automatic Fire Control 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dodge County 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR High West Hospitality 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PolyPeptide Laboratories San Diego 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Culligan - Minnetonka 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vestal Asphalt Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park and Recreation 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Wire & Cable Corp. 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.