Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers · South Carolina

Greenville, SC

Greenville, SC · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenville, SC runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Greenville, SC: 2.4 TCR = 111% of Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenville, SC safety composite

Greenville, SC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Greenville, SC: 0.0 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.89× in 2024

Greenville, SC's TCR rose 4.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423840 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 111% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #4/12
  • PHOTO 201604
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 201604 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greenville, SC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenville, SC averages 2.4 TCR (111% of the Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenville, SC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Greenville, SC falls in its industry

589 Industrial supplies (except di establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 12 Industrial supplies (except di employers in South Carolina.

Greenville, SC (22 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenville, SC
Greenville, SC (22 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Greenville, SC has fewer employees than the Industrial supplies (except disposable p median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.9 4.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423840 · SC · Greenville

589 Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 201604 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 207 - Safety International 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deckert 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MNOWA 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE Newberry Liquid Plant 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summerville SC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Business Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Richmond Community Schools-Community Youth Services 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Elementary 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HQ Office 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Buena Park 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE LANSING BUILDING PRODUCTS NORTHEAST LLC - West Bridgewater 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hevi-SHOT/Federal Cartridge Company 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warehouse Westfield IN 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Hickory - Airport 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.