Executive and legislative office combinations · South Carolina

Greenwood County Local Government

Greenwood, SC · ~500 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenwood County Local Government runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade D.

Greenwood County Local Government: 5.1 TCR = 158% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenwood County Local Government safety composite

Greenwood County Local Government scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Greenwood County Local Government: 4.0 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2019

Greenwood County Local Government's TCR rose 2.2 from 4.0 in 2018 to 6.2 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Greenwood, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 158% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #14/28
  • PHOTO City of Alcoa
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~500 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Alcoa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greenwood County Local Government in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenwood County Local Government averages 5.1 TCR (158% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenwood County Local Government TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=6.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Greenwood County Local Government falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 28 Executive and legislative offi employers in South Carolina.

Greenwood County Local Government (500 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenwood County Local Government
Greenwood County Local Government (500 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Greenwood County Local Government has more employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.2 3.2 28 1 0
2018 4.0 3.2 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · SC · Greenwood

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 102 employers in Greenwood, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Alcoa 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Tigard 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ottawa County - Hudsonville Court 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of Kenosha 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alpek Polyester USA, LLC-Columbia Site 500 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Francis Eastside 500 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Corp. & Engineering 501 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. International SC, LLC 499 FTE
CITY-NEAR Self Regional Healthcare 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lander University 1,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENWOOD LAURENS PDCA SC 716 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capsugel 693 FTE
NAT-TCR ES3 LLC : York, PA (FDC) 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Keolis Transportation 160- Lancaster 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #615 (Clintonville, WI) 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR iFLY Phoenix 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mountain Valley Express Inc. 500 FTE
NAT-SIZE LTD Aurora (Westridge) # 7 500 FTE
NAT-SIZE MN,BEMIDJI - Medical Center Campus - Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) 500 FTE
NAT-SIZE HHG Lenoir Upholstery Plant 500 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.