Distribution of electric power · Mississippi

Greenwood District Office

Greenwood, MS · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenwood District Office runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

Greenwood District Office: 1.5 TCR = 128% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenwood District Office safety composite

Greenwood District Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2024

Greenwood District Office injury rate improved

Greenwood District Office's TCR fell 6.8 from 6.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Greenwood, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.5 · 128% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/65
  • PHOTO POCSC Pocono Service…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: POCSC Pocono Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Greenwood District Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenwood District Office averages 1.5 TCR (128% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenwood District Office TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Greenwood District Office falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 65 Distribution of electric power employers in Mississippi.

Greenwood District Office (44 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenwood District Office
Greenwood District Office (44 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Greenwood District Office has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.8 4.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MS · Greenwood

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 59 employers in Greenwood, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR POCSC Pocono Service Center 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oconee 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GMP Operations HQ - Rutland 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Revenue Operations 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Batesville Generating Station 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coahoma Electric Power Association 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aladdin Construction Co., Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 51 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenwood Accessories 682 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenwood 509 FTE
CITY-NEAR 716 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 716 280 FTE
NAT-TCR Wahpeton Terminal 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Park Care Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Elkhorn Public Schools Dining 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR INSP, LLC - MediaComm 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Teinert Metals, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Coast Green Inc 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Messiah Lifeways 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE H&W Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.