Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) · South Carolina

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm

Greenwood, SC · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade A.

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm safety composite

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm held a steady TCR band

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Greenwood, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/37
  • PHOTO Furino and Sons
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Furino and Sons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm falls in its industry

924 Construction management, indus establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 37 Construction management, indus employers in South Carolina.

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm (38 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm
GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm (38 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

GreenWood, Inc. - Fujifilm has fewer employees than the Construction management, industrial buil median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · SC · Greenwood

924 Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 102 employers in Greenwood, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Furino and Sons 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.J. Padelford & Son, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7421 - Ineos Chcolate Bayou 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR River Parish Maintenance, Inc. Corporate 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Anderson 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Orchard Management 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE STOREROOM OPERATIONS CENTER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fleet/Radio (Columbia) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Self Regional Healthcare 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lander University 1,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENWOOD LAURENS PDCA SC 716 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capsugel 693 FTE
NAT-TCR Sales Group 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Sage Colleges Russel Sage 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Offshore 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert Sunshine 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Fort Lauderdale 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Instrumentation Laboratory North American Distribution Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles Area Office 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windham Store 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.