Packaging industrial design services · Pennsylvania

Greif Warminster

Warminster, PA · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greif Warminster runs at 650% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Packaging industrial design services workplace, earning a grade F.

Greif Warminster: 3.3 TCR = 650% of Packaging industrial design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greif Warminster safety composite

Greif Warminster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2018

Greif Warminster injury rate improved

Greif Warminster's TCR fell 1.6 from 4.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2018=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541420 · Warminster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.3 · 650% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK P32
  • PHOTO Greif Hazelton
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greif Hazelton (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Greif Warminster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greif Warminster averages 3.3 TCR (650% of the Packaging industrial design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Greif Warminster TCR series: 2016=4 · 2018=2.5 · BLS 0.5

Where Greif Warminster falls in its industry

25 Packaging industrial design se establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Greif Warminster (69 employees, TCR 3.3) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 15 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greif Warminster
Greif Warminster (69 employees, TCR 3.3) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Greif Warminster has more employees than the Packaging industrial design services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2016 4.0 1.4 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541420 · PA · Warminster

25 Packaging industrial design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 78 employers in Warminster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greif Hazelton 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greif Van Wert 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greif Naperville 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greif Lithonia 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 400244900 WEST CHESTER SD 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raptor LGX LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE RICHMOND_1379265 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA - Duryea, 1 Adelphia Blvd 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anns Choice 877 FTE
CITY-NEAR W. Atlee Burpee Company 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Havis PA 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burpee 300 Park 263 FTE
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City (Utltc) 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Eversource - Newtown Gas 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-OAK-OAKLAND-PD 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EC043 - Nashville, TN-0400 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paragon Tempered Glass Niles 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holland - OM 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paramelt Muskegon 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.