Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing · North Carolina

Greif Waynesville North Carolina

Waynesville, NC · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greif Waynesville North Carolina runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Greif Waynesville North Carolina: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greif Waynesville North Carolina safety composite

Greif Waynesville North Carolina scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2021→2022

Greif Waynesville North Carolina injury rate improved

Greif Waynesville North Carolina's TCR fell 5.6 from 5.6 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.6 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322130 · Waynesville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Newman & Company
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newman & Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greif Waynesville North Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greif Waynesville North Carolina averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greif Waynesville North Carolina TCR series: 2021=5.6 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Greif Waynesville North Carolina falls in its industry

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto employers in North Carolina.

Greif Waynesville North Carolina (21 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Greif Waynesville North Carolina
Greif Waynesville North Carolina (21 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Greif Waynesville North Carolina has fewer employees than the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, contai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.6 5.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322130 · NC · Waynesville

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 45 employers in Waynesville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newman & Company 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modesto-IP 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Packrite 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Indy Catawba 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timothy Yarbrough 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty NC Breeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCJA1-SEL-JASON 1' 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunburst Trout Farms 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1663 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1663 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Packaging - Waynesville 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 023 202 FTE
NAT-TCR Jerry L. Johnson & Associates 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fiesta # 49 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Giant #532 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trajen Flight Support LP - ASE 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charlson Field 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simmers Erie 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crivitz 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE STTC Edison 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.