Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · North Carolina

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc.

Monroe, NC · ~354 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 56% of Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. safety composite

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2021

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. injury rate improved

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Monroe, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Jain Irrigation-Flor…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~354 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jain Irrigation-Florida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (56% of the Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. falls in its industry

202 Tube, nonrigid plastics, manuf establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Tube, nonrigid plastics, manuf employers in North Carolina.

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. (354 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greiner Bio-One North America Inc.
Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. (354 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Greiner Bio-One North America Inc. has more employees than the Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.9 0.2 4 0 0
2020 1.6 1.1 6 0 0
2019 3.5 2.6 12 0 0
2018 1.5 1.2 5 0 0
2017 1.2 0.6 4 0 0
2016 2.4 1.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · NC · Monroe

202 Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 163 employers in Monroe, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jain Irrigation-Florida 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SANDEE PLASTIC EXTRUSIONS 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pexco, LLC - Asheboro 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viscofan USA 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caesarstone 354 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 2 354 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Wake Forest 145 354 FTE
STATE-SIZE R+L Carriers - CHR 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Plant 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-CHS Union 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-Atrium Health Union 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1108-Atrium Health Union (1108) 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR Lynchburg Campus 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Skyline Scaffold Inc Main Office 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR RJ Matthews Company 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Village Shalom 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nichols Pistachio 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheyenne Mountain Resort 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doctor Franklin Perkins School 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Diego - RBG 354 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.