Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Mississippi

Grenada Stamping and Assembly

Grenada, MS · ~196 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grenada Stamping and Assembly runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Grenada Stamping and Assembly: 8.8 TCR = 265% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grenada Stamping and Assembly safety composite

Grenada Stamping and Assembly scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

Grenada Stamping and Assembly injury rate improved

Grenada Stamping and Assembly's TCR fell 1.6 from 6.8 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 25.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=25.3 · 2023=9.0 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Grenada, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 265% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK P17
  • PHOTO toledo metal spinnin…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~196 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: toledo metal spinning company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Grenada Stamping and Assembly in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grenada Stamping and Assembly averages 8.8 TCR (265% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grenada Stamping and Assembly TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=25.3 · 2023=9 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Grenada Stamping and Assembly falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Grenada Stamping and Assembly (196 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Grenada Stamping and Assembly
Grenada Stamping and Assembly (196 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Grenada Stamping and Assembly has more employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 5.2 6 1 0
2023 9.0 7.3 16 0 0
2022 25.3 9.7 12 1 0
2021 7.4 7.1 19 1 0
2020 5.3 1.9 14 0 0
2019 4.5 0.0 8 0 0
2018 6.6 0.9 15 0 0
2016 6.8 1.1 16 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · MS · Grenada

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 36 employers in Grenada, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR toledo metal spinning company 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wrico Stamping of Minnesota 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kickhaefer Manufacturing Co - Mineral Springs 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMW - Frankfort 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 2 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE H2A complete II, Inc. L. Dicks, Inc. 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE DeBeukelaer Corporation 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE ProVia Booneville Facility 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advanced Distributor Products 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modine Manufacturing Company - Grenada OEM 763 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1074 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1074 329 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Phoenix E30 Housing 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Reeve Store Equipment Co 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR New York Marriott Marquis 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Coke Northeast 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE PA - Saks 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aludyne-Auburn 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alliance Laundry Systems - Plant 2 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE SG360 Broadview 196 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.