Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · New York

Greystone Programs, Inc.

Hopewell Junction, NY · ~408 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greystone Programs, Inc. runs at 246% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Greystone Programs, Inc.: 9.3 TCR = 246% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greystone Programs, Inc. safety composite

Greystone Programs, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2024

Greystone Programs, Inc. injury rate improved

Greystone Programs, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.9 from 9.7 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2018=9.9 · 2020=11.1 · 2022=10.7 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Hopewell Junction, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 246% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #224/336
  • PHOTO *LTSR - Long Term St…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~408 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: *LTSR - Long Term Structured Residence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Greystone Programs, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greystone Programs, Inc. averages 9.3 TCR (246% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greystone Programs, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2018=9.9 · 2020=11.1 · 2022=10.7 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Greystone Programs, Inc. falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #224 safest of 336 Group homes, intellectual and employers in New York.

Greystone Programs, Inc. (408 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Greystone Programs, Inc.
Greystone Programs, Inc. (408 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Greystone Programs, Inc. has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 3.0 19 0 0
2023 8.8 4.3 25 2 0
2022 10.7 5.5 18 13 0
2020 11.1 6.2 28 4 0
2018 9.9 7.2 22 3 0
2016 9.7 6.3 23 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Hopewell Junction

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 13 employers in Hopewell Junction, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR *LTSR - Long Term Structured Residence 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blanchard Valley Residential Services, Inc - Campus 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Mountain Support Services 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-562628 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3441 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE 420 Location 407 FTE
STATE-SIZE Military Road 407 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5242 407 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SWF2 1,996 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0034-0034-02428 FAC-02428-HOPEWELL JUNCTION-NY 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02428 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000002428 84 FTE
NAT-TCR Des Moines -IA 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Paramount Coffee Company 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 2017 - San Jose 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR KODA Energy 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eagle Financial Services, Inc 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Vista 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otter Products - Frederick Distribution Center 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maryhaven 408 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.