Commercial building construction general contractors · Tennessee

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc.

Memphis, TN · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 33% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. safety composite

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Memphis, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/95
  • PHOTO Cannon Constructors …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cannon Constructors South (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (33% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 2.9

Where Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 95 Commercial building constructi employers in Tennessee.

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. (74 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc.
Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. (74 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Grinder, Taber and Grinder, Inc. has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TN · Memphis

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,330 employers in Memphis, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cannon Constructors South 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEB Construction LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calportland Construction - Administration 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morrow Lake Solar 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Middle Tennessee Electric (Rutherford County Office) 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arcus Restoration 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reese Enterprises Inc 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Best Choice Roofing Central Florida LLC 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 2903 SPRANKLE DR 12,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 381940311 9,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Residential Services 5,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 5,599 FTE
NAT-TCR Youngwood (BP) 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR UHA Chestnut Ridge Center 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pediatric Associates - Easley 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aslpundh Tree Expert LLC-46 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3020 - Las Vegas, NV 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Wilkes Barre 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCN Telecom Services LLC - NY Woodside 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waste Industries Tidewater 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.