Ambulance services, air or ground · Connecticut

Groton Ambulance Association

Groton, CT · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Groton Ambulance Association runs at 427% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulance services, air or ground workplace, earning a grade F.

Groton Ambulance Association: 16.2 TCR = 427% of Ambulance services, air or ground BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Groton Ambulance Association safety composite

Groton Ambulance Association scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2017→2024

Groton Ambulance Association injury rate improved

Groton Ambulance Association's TCR fell 6.4 from 11.6 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 29.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.6 · 2018=28.9 · 2019=29.3 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=14.1 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · Groton, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.2 · 427% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/32
  • PHOTO Nashville Operations…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nashville Operations Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Groton Ambulance Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Groton Ambulance Association averages 16.2 TCR (427% of the Ambulance services, air or ground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Groton Ambulance Association TCR series: 2017=11.6 · 2018=28.9 · 2019=29.3 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=14.1 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Groton Ambulance Association falls in its industry

976 Ambulance services, air or gro establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 32 Ambulance services, air or gro employers in Connecticut.

Groton Ambulance Association (36 employees, TCR 16.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Groton Ambulance Association
Groton Ambulance Association (36 employees, TCR 16.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Groton Ambulance Association has fewer employees than the Ambulance services, air or ground median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 0.0 0 1 0
2021 14.1 14.1 3 0 0
2020 8.4 8.4 2 0 0
2019 29.3 29.3 4 2 0
2018 28.9 28.9 4 1 0
2017 11.6 11.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · CT · Groton

976 Ambulance services, air or ground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 67 employers in Groton, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nashville Operations Operations 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County d/b/a Indianapolis Emergency Medical Services 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Ambulance Solutions, Cincinnati 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baldwin County LGA AL MedStar Operations 16.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DW Loiselle Water Treatment Plant 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE BluSky Restoration Contractors Hartfod 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 415 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works & Equipment Maintenance 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Electric Boat, Groton, CT. 15,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Dynamics Electric Boat 12,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Inc 3,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Connecticut- Avery Point Campus 314 FTE
NAT-TCR Fairway Wholesale Distribution, LLC 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Steel, Inc. 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR B&P Packing Co.,Inc 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4040 Russell 16.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Inventors Shop LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Ventilation Systems 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio Branch 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raynham 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.