Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment · Connecticut

Groton Regency

Groton, CT · ~148 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Groton Regency runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment workplace, earning a grade D.

Groton Regency: 5.8 TCR = 151% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Groton Regency safety composite

Groton Regency scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.2

2016→2024

Groton Regency injury rate improved

Groton Regency's TCR fell 11.2 from 11.3 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.3 · 2018=11.2 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Groton, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 151% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Baldwin Family Healt…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baldwin Family Health Care - Grant Main and CAHC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Groton Regency in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Groton Regency averages 5.8 TCR (151% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Groton Regency TCR series: 2016=11.3 · 2018=11.2 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Groton Regency falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in Connecticut.

Groton Regency (148 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Groton Regency
Groton Regency (148 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Groton Regency has more employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.1 10 0 0
2023 0.3 0.3 4 25 0
2018 11.2 10.3 12 0 0
2016 11.3 8.5 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · CT · Groton

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 67 employers in Groton, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baldwin Family Health Care - Grant Main and CAHC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harbor Health Services, Inc ESP Mattapan 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HFM Chesterfield Health Center 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holyoke Health Center, Inc. 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Norpaco, Inc. 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Resource, Inc. CT Division 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMH Group 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2396 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Electric Boat, Groton, CT. 15,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Dynamics Electric Boat 12,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Inc 3,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Connecticut- Avery Point Campus 314 FTE
NAT-TCR Calbe - Long Beach Office Building 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fidelity Roof Company 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Elkton SNF LLC 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mikros Technologies LLC 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Francisco 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Txbwn - Brownsville Center 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pajoh - Johnstown 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wishe - Sheboygan 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.