Rechargeable battery packs made from purchased battery cells and housings · Georgia

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc.

Roswell, GA · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Rechargeable battery packs made from purchased battery cells and housings workplace, earning a grade C.

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Rechargeable battery packs made from purchased battery cells and housings BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. safety composite

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. held a steady TCR band

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335911 · Roswell, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/13
  • PHOTO Panasonic Energy of …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Panasonic Energy of North America (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Rechargeable battery packs made from purchased battery cells and housings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. falls in its industry

161 Rechargeable battery packs mad establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 13 Rechargeable battery packs mad employers in Georgia.

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc.
GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.1

GS Yuasa Lithium Power, Inc. has fewer employees than the Rechargeable battery packs made from pur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335911 · GA · Roswell

161 Rechargeable battery packs made from purchased battery cells and housings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 117 employers in Roswell, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Panasonic Energy of North America 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Current : Current Services 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stryten Energy 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exide Technologies 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Little Creek Ag LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jason Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Algae Energy Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE DIRT MOVERS 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR CENTRAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 1,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar North Fulton Hospital 1,137 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROSWELL CENTER (GAROS) 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAROS - ROSWELL CENTER 749 FTE
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eko Sport Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE QC Indiana 240 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Isaac heating and air conditioning Buffalo 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yji King Machine of South Carolina LLC 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.